360 check, 14 Nov 2026
Uniqlo on the pay layer: the 360 agent-readiness check
Uniqlo scores 7 of 100 on Ora's agent-readiness scan, an F, read 14 Nov 2026. The six payment checks did not apply to uniqlo.com on this read, which is how Ora treats a site it does not read as a shop. Ora asked for the home page and got nothing back, so most rows stay unverified.
On 14 Nov 2026 the public site at uniqlo.com scored 7 of 100 on Ora's agent-readiness scan, an F, in Ora's Consumer category. Uniqlo is the Japanese apparel chain of Fast Retailing, so this check reads the Payments layer first: the six checks that look for x402, MPP, UCP, ACP and AP2 on the domain, the same protocols this site's matrix tracks row by row. The other layers follow, with every check Ora ran and what it saw. Ora's one-line summary: The site gives agents almost nothing to work with: no MCP server, no OpenAPI spec and no public API.
The score
| Layer | Points | Share | What the layer asks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery | 3 of 9 | 33% | Can agents find and recommend it |
| Access | 0 of 33 | 0% | Can agents read it |
| Usability | 0 of 40 | 0% | Can agents use it |
| Payments | 0 of 0 | none apply | Can agents pay |
| Total | 7 of 100 | 7% | Grade F |
The pay layer
Ora did not run the six payment checks against uniqlo.com on this read: it marks them not applicable on a site it does not read as a shop, so the layer has no maximum and costs nothing. A retailer that sells online can still publish any of the five protocols; the matrix says which processors and platforms carry each one. Each protocol links to its matrix row, where the processors and platforms that carry it are dated and sourced.
| Payment check | Result | Points | Matrix row | What Ora saw |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| x402 | Does not apply | 0 of 2 | x402 in the matrix | No x402 payment protocol support detected. No commerce signals detected - agent-payment protocols are optional for non-commerce sites |
| MPP | Does not apply | 0 of 2 | MPP in the matrix | No MPP (Machine Payments Protocol) support detected. No commerce signals detected - agent-payment protocols are optional for non-commerce sites |
| UCP | Does not apply | 0 of 3 | UCP in the matrix | no UCP (Universal Commerce Protocol) signals detected. No commerce signals detected - agent-payment protocols are optional for non-commerce sites |
| ACP | Does not apply | 0 of 3 | ACP in the matrix | no ACP (Agentic Commerce Protocol) signals detected. No commerce signals detected - agent-payment protocols are optional for non-commerce sites |
The other layers, check by check
Every check Ora ran on uniqlo.com, grouped by layer, with the result, the points and what Ora recorded where its wording passes this site's gate.
Discovery: 3 of 9
| Check | Result | Points | What Ora saw |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARD discovery | Fail | 0 of 1 | No /.well-known/ard.json, no same-site rel="ard" link, and no legacy /.well-known/ai-catalog.json |
| Developer resource discoverability | Fail | 0 of 4 | In a search for your API docs, none of the 10 results is your official docs |
| Brand name discoverability | Pass | 3 of 3 | uniqlo.com ranks #3 for "uniqlo" (searched your brand name alone: we could not read a product term from your site) |
| NPM/PyPI SDK package | Fail | 0 of 1 | No NPM or PyPI SDK package found |
| Agent platform configs | Fail | 0 of 1 | Could not locate a public repo containing agent configs or rules. If our probes missed it, AI coding agents likely will too - link the repo from your homepage or docs so it's discoverable. |
| Agent Plugins manifest | Fail | 0 of 1 | No Agent Plugins manifest (plugin.json) found in discovered repos |
| ChatGPT app listed | Fail | 0 of 2 | Not found in ChatGPT app directory |
Access: 0 of 33
| Check | Result | Points | What Ora saw |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sitemap exists | Fail | 0 of 1 | No sitemap found |
| Not blocked by bot detection | Not run | 0 of 2 | Could not test bot user agents |
| Agent discovery file | Fail | 0 of 2 | No agent discovery file found |
| A2A / agent-card | Fail | 0 of 2 | No A2A agent card found at /.well-known/agent-card.json |
| Listed on skills.sh | Fail | 0 of 1 | No official skills self-published on skills.sh (3 community skills with potential relation to this domain found, but only self-published official skills count) |
| pricing.md exists | Fail | 0 of 2 | No pricing.md found - agents need machine-readable pricing to compare products and make purchase recommendations |
| NLWeb Schema Feeds | Fail | 0 of 1 | No robots.txt found - cannot check for Schema Feeds |
| MCP well-known discovery | Fail | 0 of 2 | No MCP server URL discovered |
| HTTP Link headers (RFC 8288) | Fail | 0 of 1 | No HTTP Link response headers (RFC 8288) found |
| Markdown URL fallback | Fail | 0 of 2 | Homepage does not support the .md suffix. Probed https://uniqlo.com/index.md and it did not return markdown (expected text/markdown content-type or a heading-led non-HTML body). |
| Modular llms.txt per product area | Fail | 0 of 1 | No section-level llms.txt found. Tried /docs/llms.txt, /api/llms.txt, /developers/llms.txt, /guides/llms.txt, /reference/llms.txt. This is a bonus check: it can add a point and never costs one. |
| llms.txt exists | Fail | 0 of 1 | No llms.txt found at https://uniqlo.com/llms.txt. Publish it at the site root, where agents that follow the llms.txt spec look for it. |
| llms.txt formatting | Fail | 0 of 2 | No llms.txt found to evaluate quality |
| JSON-LD structured data | Not run | 0 of 2 | Could not fetch homepage |
| Pricing info accessible | Fail | 0 of 3 | No pricing page or pricing data found |
| Public API/docs linked from homepage | Fail | 0 of 4 | No public API or documentation page linked from homepage |
| Agent instruction / when-to-use | Fail | 0 of 1 | No agent instruction file with when-to-use guidance found |
| Skills.sh skill quality | Fail | 0 of 2 | No official skills on skills.sh to evaluate |
| JSON-LD entity linking (sameAs) | Not run | 0 of 1 | Not run, no detail recorded. |
| Metadata completeness | Not run | 0 of 1 | Could not fetch homepage |
| Organization schema completeness | Not run | 0 of 1 | Not run, no detail recorded. |
| Trust anchor pages | Fail | 0 of 1 | No trust anchor pages found with sufficient content (About, Contact, Privacy) |
| OpenAPI spec published | Fail | 0 of 8 | No OpenAPI/Swagger specification found |
| Developer portal | Fail | 0 of 5 | No developer portal found |
| API catalog (RFC 9727) | Fail | 0 of 2 | No /.well-known/api-catalog found (RFC 9727) |
| Markdown agent docs | Not run | 0 of 1 | Could not fetch with Accept: text/markdown |
| Markdown content negotiation (acceptmarkdown.com) | Fail | 0 of 1 | Could not probe both Accept: text/markdown and Accept: text/html on the homepage https://uniqlo.com |
| Bot-UA markdown serving | Fail | 0 of 1 | No probed bot User-Agent (ChatGPT-User, Claude-User, Perplexity-User) receives markdown when requesting HTML. Optional: detect AI-bot UAs server-side and serve them a markdown representation directly. |
Usability: 0 of 40
| Check | Result | Points | What Ora saw |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public API with reachable endpoints | Fail | 0 of 8 | No publicly reachable API surface detected (REST and GraphQL both absent or auth-gated) |
| Agent onboarding friction | Fail | 0 of 2 | Insufficient content to evaluate onboarding friction |
| Web Bot Auth directory | Fail | 0 of 2 | No /.well-known/http-message-signatures-directory found |
| auth.md exists | Fail | 0 of 2 | No /auth.md found at site root |
| auth.md structure | Fail | 0 of 2 | No /auth.md found at site root |
| Agent auth discovery metadata | Fail | 0 of 3 | Neither /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource nor /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server found. Probed: uniqlo.com, api.uniqlo.com. |
| Agent auth WWW-Authenticate hint | Fail | 0 of 1 | No 401 with WWW-Authenticate: Bearer resource_metadata=... found. Probed [https://uniqlo.com/api, https://uniqlo.com/api/v1, https://uniqlo.com/v1, https://uniqlo.com/v2, https://uniqlo.com/agent/identity, https://uniqlo.com/agent/auth |
| agent_auth endpoints reachable | Fail | 0 of 2 | No agent_auth endpoint URIs found in AS metadata or /auth.md prose; nothing to probe |
| MCP server / manifest | Fail | 0 of 10 | No MCP server or manifest found |
| WebMCP support | Fail | 0 of 8 | No WebMCP support detected - no document.modelContext / navigator.modelContext usage found |
| JSON error responses | Fail | 0 of 3 | API does not return JSON error responses (or no API detected) |
| CLI tool available | Fail | 0 of 3 | No CLI tool found |
| NLWeb /ask endpoint | Fail | 0 of 1 | No response from /ask endpoint |
| NLWeb streaming support | Fail | 0 of 1 | No response from /ask endpoint for streaming request |
| MCP server-card.json | Fail | 0 of 2 | No MCP server card found (checked /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json, the site's ai-catalog.json, servers[].card in mcp.json, and <server>/server-card) |
| Product + docs MCP coverage | Fail | 0 of 2 | This bonus needs two MCP servers: one for your product so agents can take actions, and a separate one for your documentation so agents can answer questions from your docs. |
| Agent-friendly 404s | Not run | 0 of 2 | Not run, no detail recorded. |
| API schema complexity analysis | Fail | 0 of 2 | No API schema detected |
| Function calling compatibility | Fail | 0 of 2 | No API spec found - function calling requires discoverable endpoints |
The fixes worth most points
Ora attaches an estimate to each failing or partial check: how many points the site would gain by passing it. These are the 5 with the largest estimates for Uniqlo.
- MCP server / manifest
- Fail, 0 of 10, about 11.1 points to gain. Ora saw:
No MCP server or manifest found
. - Developer resource discoverability
- Fail, 0 of 4, about 9.9 points to gain. Ora saw:
In a search for your API docs, none of the 10 results is your official docs
. - Public API with reachable endpoints
- Fail, 0 of 8, about 8.9 points to gain. Ora saw:
No publicly reachable API surface detected (REST and GraphQL both absent or auth-gated)
. - WebMCP support
- Fail, 0 of 8, about 8.9 points to gain. Ora saw:
No WebMCP support detected - no document.modelContext / navigator.modelContext usage found
. - OpenAPI spec published
- Fail, 0 of 8, about 8.1 points to gain. Ora saw:
No OpenAPI/Swagger specification found
.
Our read
Uniqlo's read turns on a home page Ora never received. The request for it got no page back, so the bot-detection test, the robots.txt policy for search and user-triggered agents, content without JavaScript, JSON-LD and metadata are all unverified rather than failed; Ora is careful to add that a rate limit, server error or timeout is not a block. The six payment checks did not apply on this read: Ora did not read the site as a shop. The Access layer reads 0 of 33. What Ora could check directly is thin, with no sitemap found and nothing at /llms.txt. The Usability layer reads 0 of 40, with neither an MCP server nor a public API, and a search for Uniqlo's API docs returned no official page among 10 results. The brand search placed uniqlo.com third. The fix worth most is an MCP server, about 11.1 points. An F at 7: Ora came for the home page and left with an empty response.
Test your own checkout
The scan above is free and needs no account: enter a domain at ora.ai and read the same layers for your own site, with the six payment checks mapped to this matrix on the Ora Payments page. The command below runs the same audit from a terminal and exits with 1 under the score you set, so it can gate a deploy. Why Ora, and its limits.
npx ax@0.10 audit https://example.com --min-score 70All 360 checks, one company a day. Corrections to the corrections page.
Sources
- ora.ai/api/score/uniqlo.com, Ora's scan (vendor), read 14 Nov 2026
- Ora's scoring rules, version 3 (vendor), read 14 Nov 2026
- Ora check catalog (GET /api/checks), read 14 Nov 2026
- uniqlo.com, the company's site, read 14 Nov 2026
Last reviewed